![]() |
2010-02-10 - 10:50 a.m. I wasn't going to dwell on this, however DO find it somewhat upsetting that today when going to the on line site of my divorce case in which the discovered order of 04/08 indicated "Motion to Destroy Exhibits" I find that the ON LINE RECORD HAS been updated with the most recent renewed litigation as my Ex is seeking FULL CUSTODY, but the on line record ALSO now STARTS in MAY of 2008. Meaning the 4/08 order to "destroy exhibits" is no longer available for public viewing. I also note one can not find my case by the search of my name which formerly worked. I am growing really weary of this nonsense. Thank God today is a terrible snow day and I couldn't get to work anyway! I suppose its just as well that I don't work from home nor will EVER until I am POSITIVE THAT It WOULD be secure for my COMPANY for me to log in from home. I went to bed at 1am after NOT Being done with my Response for the court. Its a long process of editing for me as I DO NOT believe in rambling and NOT being succinct in legal docs. Writing isn't the hard part for me. Its the EDITING, and the cleaning up of formatting and making it "pretty" which takes me a long time. I AM VERY GRATEFUL that the judge DID allow me to have the opportunity to argue that this matter shouldn't be heard. I mean ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. I am honestly still crafting some arguments, tweaking, and doing some legal research to see if I can throw in SOME case law for good measure in my arguing this shouldn't even be heard. I think AT SOME POINT the court too is going to get sick of my Ex continuing to attack me. He is now doing so in the only way he really can: by using constant litigation as the tool for disrupting my life. Amazing. Custody battles are MORE disruptive and emotionally destabilizing for children than the occasional lateness, or his temper and anger and going overboard with his physical discipline. The act of continuing to attack me is what I am SURE is the most damaging of the experiences the girls have to navigate in their lives. I hope the court agreed and decides to put a stop to this current attempt at further litigation. Here is the stupid, albeit abbreviated record SANS the Order to "Destroy Exhibits" Note that even though this is the divorce case that I Filed, this is indicative of the history of the litigation as it was then filled with MOtion after MOtion from the Defendant (My EX) that I had to respond to. STUPID. The small chapter represented below happens to also include the weird motion he made regarding school enrollment when I had NO INTENTION of moving the kids out of their school!I was surprised the court even heard that frivolous matter as my response indicated there was NO RIPE LEGAL ISSUE. Heck with the motion to Enjoin relocation out of Loudoun I am not going anywhere. Today with all this snow, I am actually grateful for that. This will be a Personal Day for me. Ce la vie... At least it didn't come down yesterday like expected and I got three contracts completed and out the door at work. DAMN this Response thing is so much HARDER as I don't do it all the time! Loudoun County Circuit - Civil Division Case Number: CL00043937-01 Filed Type Party Judge Book Page Remarks � � ![]() |